@@@@@ @   @ @@@@@    @     @ @@@@@@@   @       @  @@@@@ @@@@@ @@@
         @   @   @ @        @ @ @ @    @       @     @   @   @   @   @  @
         @   @@@@@ @@@@     @  @  @    @        @   @    @   @   @   @   @
         @   @   @ @        @     @    @         @ @     @   @   @   @  @
         @   @   @ @@@@@    @     @    @          @      @@@@@ @@@@@ @@@

                        Mt. Holz Science Fiction Society
                    Club Notice - 07/04/97 -- Vol. 16, No. 1

       MT Chair/Librarian:
                     Mark Leeper   MT 3E-433  732-957-5619 mleeper@lucent.com
       HO Chair:     John Jetzt    MT 2E-530  732-957-5087 jetzt@lucent.com
       HO Librarian: Nick Sauer    HO 4F-427  732-949-7076 njs@lucent.com
       Distinguished Heinlein Apologist:
                     Rob Mitchell  MT 2D-536  732-957-6330 rlmitchell1@lucent.com
       Factotum:     Evelyn Leeper MT 3E-433  732-957-2070 eleeper@lucent.com
       Back issues at http://www.geocities.com/Athens/4824
       All material copyright by author unless otherwise noted.

       The Science Fiction Association of Bergen County meets on the
       second Saturday of every month in Upper Saddle River; call
       201-933-2724 for details.  The New Jersey Science Fiction Society
       meets on the third Saturday of every month in Belleville; call
       201-432-5965 for details.  The Denver Area Science Fiction
       Association meets 7:30 PM on the third Saturday of every month at
       Southwest State Bank, 1380 S. Federal Blvd.

       1. URL of the week: http://www.locusmag.com/.  LOCUS magazine.   [-
       ecl]

       ===================================================================

       2. A corrected version of Mark Leeper's review of BATMAN AND  ROBIN
       appears later in this issue.  A paragraph in last week's edition of
       the review was accidentally truncated.  [-ecl]

       ===================================================================

       3. BABYLON 5 has been renewed, but the fifth  season  will  run  on
       TNT, not on the PTEN network stations.  (In New York, this means it
       will not be on WWOR.)

       On 4 January 1998, the new BABYLON 5 movie, IN THE BEGINNING,  will
       be  broadcast  on  TNT  at  8PM EST, followed by a broadcast of the
       BABYLON 5 pilot, THE GATHERING, at 10PM.  They will be  rebroadcast
       immediately following at 12M and 2AM Sunday.

       The next day, TNT will start running the first four  seasons  every
       weekday night at either 6PM or 7PM EST.
       The fifth season will start Monday, 19 January,  and  the  episodes
       will  be  broadcast Mondays at 10PM EST and Saturdays at either 6PM
       or 7PM EST.

       There will also be a "Making of" show sometime in January.  [-ecl]

       ===================================================================

       4. It is not often that  I  write  about  sports  in  this  column.
       Generally  I  tend to avoid sports on TV, in movies, and just about
       anyplace else that avoiding sports is feasible.  If I cannot  avoid
       sports  I will do the next best thing, which is to root against the
       home team.  If the home team wins, it  will  only  encourage  them.
       Everything else being equal, I want to live in a place far from the
       nearest team.  If I cannot do that, I want to have  losers  playing
       on  any  local  team.   For  me baseball on TV is what preempts the
       science fiction film scheduled to  follow  it.   I  lost  my  first
       viewing  of  WHEN  WORLDS  COLLIDE  that  way.   They  weren't even
       playing.  The game  was  over  but  they  were  doing  a  post-game
       analysis  for  those  who sat through the game but were too dumb to
       understand what they saw.  And it wasn't like it moved too fast  to
       follow, it was, after all, baseball.

       So I usually ignore sports, but then it is not often that sports as
       funny  as  it  was this week makes national news.  I am talking, of
       course, about the usually staid and contemplative Mike Tyson biting
       each  of  Evander Holyfield's ears in a fight last Saturday, in one
       case actually biting a piece off  so  that  reconstructive  plastic
       surgery  is called for.  I think that prize-fighting makes baseball
       look like an intelligent game.  Tyson was angry at Holyfield for  a
       headbutt--headbutt is a particularly apt juxtaposition of words for
       the boxing game I think--and he decided to take  revenge  on  those
       ears.   Tyson  initially was going to claim that the ears were just
       hanging there in front of him, looking big and tempting, and  hence
       that  constitutes  entrapment.   I  mean, a man as erudite as Tyson
       would never think of chomping on somebody's aural appendages on his
       own;  he  had  to  have been seduced.  Tyson was going to fight his
       punishment legally in court until he was  informed  by  his  lawyer
       that  it  would  be a virtual legal impossibility to reassemble the
       Simpson jury.  Tyson, as you may remember, was convicted of rape  a
       few  years  back but is now trying to rehabilitate himself and be a
       productive member of society by beating  up  other  people  without
       biting or eye-gouging.  He just had a momentary lapse.

       By ear-biting Tyson may have blown any reputation he might have had
       as a deep thinker.  So now he is taking a more conciliatory stance,
       saying basically "oops" and that biting this big sweaty ear hanging
       in  front  of  him was the kind of mistake anybody could have made.
       Of course, this incident  may  have  caused  an  unintentional  but
       precipitous drop in the stock price for Tyson Foods.  It looks like
       Tyson may lose his license to box.  Instead he  will  probably  try
       for  the role of Turiddu in the opera CAVALLERIA RUSTICANA.  (And I
       bet there won't be many people who get THAT joke.)  [-mrl]

       ===================================================================

       5. REMNANT POPULATION (339pp, hardcover ISBN  0-671-87718-6;  there
       is also a paperback edition) (a book review by Joseph A. Karpierz):

       I didn't know much about Elizabeth Moon when I  picked  up  REMNANT
       POPULATION,  other  than  the  fact  that my wife read a lot of her
       books.  I was actually quite surprised to see a book by Moon on the
       Hugo   nominations  list,  probably  mostly  because  I  have  this
       preconceived notion of the type of book she writes  that  certainly
       doesn't  fit  my  description  of  Hugo  material.  While I enjoyed
       reading REMNANT POPULATION, it did nothing to  change  my  opinion.
       Now before the Moon fans out there get all up in arms, I didn't say
       that she couldn't develop into  that  kind  of  writer;   I'm  just
       saying that right now, I have no reason to believe that she is that
       kind of writer.

       The novel begins just before the  evacuation  of  a  colony  on  an
       unnamed planet by a corporation that, as we find out a later in the
       book, didn't do a very good job in  choosing  a  location  for  the
       colony--the  weather is just not conducive to long term settlement.
       The central character of the story, Ofelia, is an old woman who  is
       deemed  expendable  by  the  corporation  as  nonproductive and too
       expensive to take along, although by law they have to.  So when she
       decides  to  stay behind anyway because she prefers her solitude to
       the life and family she had, it turns out not to be a bad deal--she
       doesn't  get  on  the  last  shuttle,  and they don't look for her.
       Everybody is happy.

       Ofelia attempts to make a life for herself, and does quite well  at
       it.   She  learns  how  to  use  the  colony  control center, which
       contains all the hardware for support, such as power, to help  keep
       herself  alive.   She  uses  the  weather  satellite communications
       device to keep track of the storms,  the  freezer  there  to  store
       food,  etc.   One  day on the communications console she hears that
       another colony is getting set to land, only to be destroyed by some
       strange creatures that no one knew was there.

       From there, the story falls to the usual trappings of this kind  of
       tale:  Ofelia meets the creatures, befriends them, becomes accepted
       by them, and has to deal with authorities coming to check out  what
       happened to the destroyed ship.

       There is really nothing new here; it's  been  done  so  many  times
       before that we should be used to it by now.  That's not to say that
       I didn't enjoy reading the book.  I think that the  story  is  well
       told,  and  Moon's  style  is very straightforward, which I enjoyed
       encountering directly after reading BLUE MARS.  It's a good,  light
       summer  read for a day at the beach, or while you're curled up in a
       chair next to a fireplace in the wintertime, but  it  really  isn't
       much  more  than that.  But that's okay, because we need books like
       that anyway.  So enjoy it.  [-jak]

       ===================================================================

       6. MY BEST FRIEND'S WEDDING (a film review by Mark R. Leeper):

                 Capsule: Julia  Roberts  plays  a  manipulative
                 woman  determined  to  win back the love of her
                 former lover and best friend when he  announces
                 he  is  going  to  marry  someone  else.   Five
                 minutes into the film the  whole  plot  becomes
                 obvious, though there is some fun in seeing the
                 details filled in.  Rating: low +1 (-4 to  +4),
                 5 (0 to 10)  [Spoiler warning: I will reveal no
                 more  than  was  in  the  trailer  of  MY  BEST
                 FRIEND'S   WEDDING,   but   that  has  a  large
                 spoiler.]
                 New York Critics: 10 positive,  4  negative,  9
                 mixed

       It is not clear what the rules  of  spoilers  are.   It  may  be  a
       spoiler  just to say that a film is predictable.  But there is only
       one way MY BEST FRIEND'S WEDDING can go once the premise is  known.
       And even the trailer tells what the premise is.  A conniving woman,
       played by Julia Roberts, once had a steamy relationship with a  man
       who  has  since  remained her best friend.  Now he intends to marry
       someone else.  Roberts determines she will break up the  plans  and
       marry the man herself.  The plans are made even more difficult when
       she discovers that the wife-to-be is a very sweet woman  and  would
       be  a  perfect  mate.   There is only one non-bizarre plot that can
       come from that premise and it is obvious ten minutes into the film.
       The style of the film, however, is all in the details.

       Julia Roberts plays Julianne Potter, a food critic whose has a long
       history  with  now  sports  writer Michael O'Neal (played by Dermot
       Mulroney) as a close friend, confidant, and one-time ardent  lover.
       Each  has  held  the  other as a sort of ideal of the opposite sex.
       The two have made a pact that they would marry by the age of 26  if
       neither  has found someone better.  Now at age 26, Michael suddenly
       wants to talk to Julianne.  She is terrified that she may  have  to
       make good on her pledge.  Her fear, however, turns to rage when she
       discovers that Michael has found the perfect bride and  it  is  not
       her.   Kimmy  Wallace  (Cameron  Diaz)  could  have  been computer-
       designed to be impossible  competition  for  Michael's  affections.
       She  is beautiful, she is heir to lots and lots of money, and worst
       of all she is incredibly nice--especially to  Julianne.   She  also
       has  the one quality that Julianne could never for herself to have,
       she is romantic and Julianne's inability to  be  romantic  is  what
       broke up her affair with Michael.  Now she is desperate to break up
       the marriage and snag Michael for herself.

       Julianne has another  male  confidant,  her  handsome  and  worldly
       publisher  George (Rupert Everett).  In fact George would also seem
       to be a perfect mate for Julianne but for the fact he is gay.  With
       George's  reluctant counseling Julianne sets off to discredit Kimmy
       by foul means or fouler.  The campaign  starts  in  a  karaoke  bar
       where  Julianne  contrives  to have non-singer Kimmy embarrassed by
       having to perform in front of the entire bar.  Predictably the plot
       backfires  as  Kimmy more than makes up in style for what she lacks
       in voice.  Julianne's devices to discredit Kimmy get more and  more
       desperate  and  more  and more devious, as she is determined not to
       have herself defeated by a woman who is merely sweet, sincere,  and
       romantic.

       As the film follows its trajectory, the story  is  fleshed  out  by
       scenes, some of which make sense and some of which that just do not
       work.  The most enjoyable show  Julianne's  close  friendship  with
       George.   Ronald  Bass's  screenplay goes in for extremes and makes
       George just a wonderful man.  His advice is  always  right  on  the
       mark,  but  he  willingly  lets  himself  be  embroiled  in  one of
       Julianne's schemes.  One of the scenes  that  definitely  does  not
       work  and  even  takes a turn for the surreal has George getting an
       entire restaurant singing "I Say a Little Prayer for  You."   (Also
       somewhat  unbelievable  is  a  mishap  at a pre-wedding brunch that
       certainly appears to be a physical impossibility.)

       Julia Roberts generally plays women with  aggressive  personalities
       and  is  well-cast here.  Cameron Diaz has too few scenes where she
       has to be more than Miss Perfect.  She gets a better scene  or  two
       later in the film, but like the Cheshire cat what sticks with us is
       her smile and the rest fades from memory.   Dermot  Mulroney  plays
       the  McGuffin--both  sides  are  fighting  for  him and it is never
       really clear why.  During the opening credits, while an  incredibly
       pink girl group sings "Wishing and Hoping," the one optimistic note
       was to see that M. Emmet Walsh was in the film.   Sadly  while  the
       film gets better, it never really uses Walsh to any advantage.

       MY BEST FRIEND'S WEDDING is  a  serviceable  romantic  comedy,  for
       those  who are not fond of surprises.  I rate it a low +1 on the -4
       to +4 scale.  [-mrl]

       ===================================================================

       7. BATMAN AND ROBIN (a film review by Mark R. Leeper):

       [Sentences in this review were accidentally  truncated  last  week.
       here is the corrected version.]

                 Capsule: BATMAN AND ROBIN combines  the  pacing
                 of  a Hong Kong action film with the plot depth
                 of  a  Hong  Kong  action  film.   The  current
                 chapter  has  some  interesting  visuals  if it
                 would ever slow down enough to let the audience
                 appreciate  them,  but the writing is the worst
                 of any of the series.  Rating:  low -1  (-4  to
                 +4), 2 (0 to 10)
                 New York Critics: 2 positive, 10  negative,  12
                 mixed

       Someone decided it was time for another  Batman  film.   Note  that
       this  is not the same thing as saying that somebody had a good idea
       for a Batman story that they wanted to film.  I did  not  say  that
       someone  was  really excited about the possibilities for the Batman
       character and the peripheral people in Batman's life.  But time has
       definitely  passed  and the cash cow was ready for another squeeze.
       Batman  (George  Clooney)  and  Robin  (Chris   O'Donnell)   battle
       Mr. Freeze  (Arnold  Schwarzenegger)  a villain who wants to freeze
       the world and Poison Ivy (Uma Thurman) who  can  make  people  love
       her,  has  a  poison  kiss,  and  wants  to make the world safe for
       plants.  Batman's butler Alfred (Michael Gough) is  dying.   Batman
       and  Robin  have  a  falling  out over Ivy.  Alfred's British niece
       (Alicia Silverstone) becomes Batgirl.  And this plot  is  just  one
       minor  feature  of  the  new  BATMAN  AND  ROBIN!  If I seem not to
       consider the plot very important, you should see the  treatment  it
       gets  from  director  Joel Schumacher.  The script was not ready to
       film and Schumacher should have rejected  it.   Clearly  there  are
       better  things  to  do with the villains than to have them call the
       title characters "Batface and Birdbrain."  Ivy was  turned  into  a
       monster  by  being buried with some poisons for a few minutes.  She
       comes back to life and immediately says various parts of  her  have
       been  replaced by chemicals and her lips are now poison.  How would
       she know?  One sparkling line in the film has a scientist  claiming
       to have drilled "three concentric circles" into somebody's skull.

       Top-billed as Mr. Freeze is Arnold Schwarzenegger, who may be  able
       to  bench  press  a Buick but finds it beyond his ability to push a
       performance out through thick layers of  blue  makeup  and  plastic
       suit.   The  concept  of a villain who fell into a freezing vat and
       now wants to freeze the world left me  cold,  and  Schwarzenegger's
       performance  is  an  absolute zero with none of his natural wit and
       far too many lamely unfunny one-liners.  Physically, George Clooney
       looks  the most like the comic book Bruce Wayne of the three actors
       who have played him so far, or put another way, this is  the  first
       one who looked at all the part.  The problem is that Clooney is not
       a very exciting or even interesting actor.  And if  you  cannot  be
       exciting  as Batman, you may just not be destined to be exciting at
       all.  Chris O'Donnell plays Robin, the Boy Wonder who in my days of
       reading   the   comic  was  eternally  about  fourteen  years  old.
       Unfortunately it is hard to find a fourteen-year-old  with  marquee
       value.  Putting O'Donnell in the role becomes an increasingly silly
       piece of casting each time he shows up.  This leaves the BATMAN AND
       ROBIN wide open to be stolen by the fourth-billed Uma Thurman.  Uma
       Thurman!  How bad do three actors have to be for a  decorative  but
       dull Uma Thurman to turn in the most interesting performance?  Next
       comes Alicia Silverstone as Barbara Wilson,  soon  to  be  Batgirl.
       Silverstone  is  a  cute blonde who gets most of her personality by
       making funny expressions with her  mouth:  biting  her  lower  lip,
       pouting,  so  forth.   The  script  apparently  calls for her to be
       British, but she made no attempt to sound British and nobody cared.
       Michael  Gough,  who has been in ALL FOUR Batman films turns in the
       most touching performance and may well be the  best  actor  in  the
       film.

       With each new Batman film Gotham City becomes more deeply  engulfed
       by  the  inevitable  and all-consuming advance of Art Nouveau.  The
       art style appears to be chewing  up  all  the  more  normal-looking
       buildings and spitting out titanic geometric formations and baroque
       reliefs and statues of colossal human figures.  Gotham seems unable
       to  stem  the tide, but apparently Batman has not been called.  The
       city has gone from resembling Helsinki in the first film  to  being
       an incredible architectural nightmare in BATMAN AND ROBIN.  Perhaps
       the one saving grace of  the  film  is  that  it  does  bring  this
       abstract  art-form  to  the masses.  But this combines with Stephen
       Goldblatt's dark photography and  Dennis  Virkler's  fast  editing.
       The  result  is  a film that might be entertaining to look at if it
       were just a little more sparse and if the pace were cut down just a
       bit.   But there were many scenes in which I had to ask myself what
       it was that I just saw.

       BATMAN AND ROBIN is a sloppy and slapdash film that gets a  low  -1
       on the -4 to +4 scale.  [-mrl]

       ===================================================================

       8. FREMDER by Russell Hoban  (Jonathan  Cape,  ISBN  0-224-04370-6,
       1996, 184pp, L14.99) (a book review by Evelyn C. Leeper):

       In the 21st century (a very different 21st  century  than  that  of
       Greg  Egan's  DISTRESS,  though they take place in only three years
       apart), Fremder Gorn is found floating in space  sans  space  suit,
       sans helmet, sans everything--everything but life that is.  This is
       considered strange, even in  Gorn's  universe  of  spaceports  with
       robot  sweepers under noctolux lamps cleaning up under signs saying
       "Mikhail's Quiksnak" and "Q-Bo Sleep."   Fremder  Gorn's  quest  to
       find  out how he came to be floating in space also involves finding
       out what happened to his mother, a famous inventor, and the  almost
       predictable interaction with mysterious government agencies et al.

       But Hoban is not so much a novelist as a poet.  His classic RIDDLEY
       WALKER proves he has an eye for language and sounds rarely found in
       science fiction, and even his narratives written in  more  standard
       language  (KLEINZEIT,  THE LION OF BOAZ-JACHIN AND JACHIN-BOAZ, THE
       MEDUSA FREQUENCY, PILGERMANN, and TURTLE DIARY are the ones I  know
       of)  are  more  novel-length  free verse than prose.  I'm sure some
       lit-crit major will explain that there are strict  rules  for  free
       verse  that this doesn't meet.  But to my untutored ear, a sentence
       like "I've always considered sleep after lovemaking  more  intimate
       than  the  lovemaking:  getting  through  the night together, lying
       embraced until an arm becomes numb, then lying  together  like  two
       spoons  until  sleep  doesn't come that way, then turning backs and
       reverting to aloneness together and the snores,  farts,  and  sleep
       seemed  to  have  no rest: she mumbled laughed, cursed, quoted from
       the Bible, sometimes in a voice  that  seemed  different  from  her
       own."  This is a book that cries out for a reading by the author.

       Anyone who has read any of Russell Hoban's works  will  immediately
       want to know how to get a copy of this, his latest and perhaps most
       traditional science fiction book.  (This is not to say that  it  is
       traditional  by  any  normal  definition  of  the term, of course.)
       Unfortunately for us USans, this is available  only  in  a  British
       edition,  and  it  will  probably  be a while before it crosses the
       Atlantic--assuming it ever does.  (Why do I latch on to authors who
       are impossible to find here?)  Of his other works I mentioned, only
       RIDDLEY WALKER (a post-holocaust novel) and  PILGERMANN  (a  first-
       person  story  by a Jew during the Crusades, perhaps best described
       as magical realism) have been published in the United States, where
       Hoban  is  known  primarily  as an author of children's books.  His
       others--KLEINZEIT (an eventful and mysterious day in  the  life  of
       its  eponymous  hero),  THE  LION OF BOAZ-JACHIN AND JACHIN-BOAZ (a
       quest for lions in a country that *seems* to  be  modern  England),
       THE  MEDUSA  FREQUENCY (involving the talking head of Orpheus and a
       Vermeer portrait), and TURTLE DIARY are the ones I know of--seem to
       be available only in British editions from Picador.

       (And now that I've pulled his other books off the shelf to refer to
       them, I want to go back and re-read them all.)  [-ecl]

                                          Mark Leeper
                                          MT 3E-433 732-957-5619
                                          mleeper@lucent.com

            Man is a dog's ideal of what God should be.
                                          -- Holbrook Jackson